<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anti-Interstate movement cropping up in western Illinois</title>
	<atom:link href="http://welcometoforgotonia.com/2010/06/anti-interstate-movement-cropping-up-in-western-illinois/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://welcometoforgotonia.com/2010/06/anti-interstate-movement-cropping-up-in-western-illinois/</link>
	<description>Dispatches from a Midwestern life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 01:40:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradley Dilger</title>
		<link>http://welcometoforgotonia.com/2010/06/anti-interstate-movement-cropping-up-in-western-illinois/comment-page-1/#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradley Dilger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 15:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welcometoforgotonia.com/?p=2141#comment-560</guid>
		<description>Setting aside the question of whether this road is needed at all (which I think is a big question, given the lack of traffic on the Quincy-Macomb 336): why is a completely new right of way is needed? Why not just four-lane Ilinois 116 from Roseville to Peoria, and connect it to the already completed 336 via US 67? 

Alternatively, why not four-lane the parts of US 24 and US 136 which aren&#039;t already up to speed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Setting aside the question of whether this road is needed at all (which I think is a big question, given the lack of traffic on the Quincy-Macomb 336): why is a completely new right of way is needed? Why not just four-lane Ilinois 116 from Roseville to Peoria, and connect it to the already completed 336 via US 67? </p>
<p>Alternatively, why not four-lane the parts of US 24 and US 136 which aren&#8217;t already up to speed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

